1/ I am concerned about how the next few years could decide the future of AI. 2/ Mental health improves decision-making and social coordination. 3/ I may be world-class at helping others outgrow lifelong issues. ⇒ I should focus on helping people in strategic AI positions.
I'm curious - with the success of your Bounty Method so far, have you considered seeing if you can start replicating the knowledge/methodology in any way, such as seeing if you can train anyone else to exhibit some of the capabilities you're demonstrating here?
I'm guessing no - certainly, by traditional science's methods, it would be premature - but with the acceleration of the modern age, it might be worth considering.
Which I guess is a silly way of saying 'If you're at all interested in teaching, would love to learn anything I can of how you are helping people'
Do you think it's something you could actually teach to an AI in the near future?
Like with humans we know - assuming the right students - they will be able to start acquiring the skillset even if it can't be fully articulated in words, simply by repeated demonstration, practice, and feedback.
So far I'm seeing very few hints of AI being anywhere near acquiring that capability. It can seemingly mimic it, but my understanding is that's more a case of 'It looks similar, but is super different under the hood' rather than like, convergent evolution coming into play.
I'm curious - with the success of your Bounty Method so far, have you considered seeing if you can start replicating the knowledge/methodology in any way, such as seeing if you can train anyone else to exhibit some of the capabilities you're demonstrating here?
I'm guessing no - certainly, by traditional science's methods, it would be premature - but with the acceleration of the modern age, it might be worth considering.
Which I guess is a silly way of saying 'If you're at all interested in teaching, would love to learn anything I can of how you are helping people'
need more data first, but yes thinking about it.
assuming my process works, the real question is how many humans i train before cloning the process with a voice-to-voice AI.
Do you think it's something you could actually teach to an AI in the near future?
Like with humans we know - assuming the right students - they will be able to start acquiring the skillset even if it can't be fully articulated in words, simply by repeated demonstration, practice, and feedback.
So far I'm seeing very few hints of AI being anywhere near acquiring that capability. It can seemingly mimic it, but my understanding is that's more a case of 'It looks similar, but is super different under the hood' rather than like, convergent evolution coming into play.